Do Humans Matter?
24 Oct
24 Oct
[...] The history of Earth as a clock… Share this:FacebookStumbleUponTwitterPrintEmailDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]
[...] Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison. Vía: Culture of Science. Podéis ver más gráficos en Factoría dMultimedia. [...]
[...] Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison. Vía: Culture of Science. Podéis ver más gráficos en Factoría [...]
[...] Do Humans Matter? | Culture of Science Source: UW-Geoscience Depends on your perspective.. [...]
[...] de Wisconsin-Madison. Vía: Culture of Science. Podéis ver más gráficos en Factoría [...]
[...] and ordinary, year, relish each moment on this remarkable planet. (Here’s more on just how brief a moment it’s been for humans so [...]
[...] may want to spend a few minutes contemplating "The Hisory of the Earth as a Clock" (here). In the grand scheme of things, the current crises are a mere passing cloud. [...]
[...] Related: Do Humans Matter? [...]
[...] and ordinary, year, penchant any impulse on this conspicuous planet. (Here’s some-more on just how brief a impulse it’s been for humans so far.) VN:F [1.9.11_1134]please wait…Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)VN:F [1.9.11_1134]Rating: 0 [...]
Looking at the clock, what happens to humans next (in the next hundreds of thousands of years) can help answer the question more than anything. Great representation of the timeline though, very fun.
Next to humans? Robot Era.
Look up the Singularity, and Ray Kurzweil if you want some crazy ideas on how the future could turn out.
Agreed – a fascinating book and documentary.
Slightly scary too! It made me feel like it’s inevitable.
Oh, but it kinda is inevitable. The way we learn new technologies and the selfish mind of humans… There’s no doubt that we will soon destroy our own race. Sure, it’s possible to prevent it, but look at how badly the global crises are handled. We really don’t care about our future as long as we get some money and maybe even fame.
you watch too much tv.
Given the 200 million years between the beginning of dinosaurs and humans (1 hr on the clock), I don’t think the a few hundred thousand years is going to change the timeline’s appearance much.
1 hr = 200 million years? Thought the Big Bang was 13700000000 year ago.
You mean 570833333 years by any chance?
The earth is around 4.54 billion years old which makes an hour on this timeline equate to 190 million years. The big bang is irrelevant.
Man, life was a serious procrastinator.
Non-linear development.
Great chart =D. It really shows another perspective on the importance (or lack thereof) of humans. One thing that would improve an already good graphic would be a scale (such as 1 minute = xxx years). This way, viewers could think about and appreciate the significant amount of time that each took to develop…and also the relative novelty of that which we call humans.
Do humans matter? We arrived that late in the scheme of things and we’ve done this amount of damage? Yikes!
I’ve read something somewhere or seen a video and some guy said it, that the human kingdom is most closely related to that of the fungi kingdom… So maybe this has something to do with th fact of what you pointed out.
The age of the earth is approximately 4.54 billion years, so your scale is:
1 second = 52,546 years
Humans have not been on Earth for over four million years.
he said earth not humans.
according to the chart, humans have been around for 77 seconds which would equate to 4 million 46 thousand and 42 years based on these numbers.
Depends on your definition of human. The genus homo has been around for quite a while
Look at it again. According to the chart humans have been around for less than two seconds.
@BTN Less than 2 minutes.
@Slick Quite right
Wikipedia – Homo is the genus that includes modern humans and species closely related to them. The genus is estimated to be about 2.3 to 2.4 million years old.
Scientific progress is moving at such a breakneck pace, that if we don’t destroy ourselves, we’ll be capable of truly awesome things beyond our current comprehension.
I doubt that progress will ever move beyond our present ability to comprehend, but much knowledge is even now beyond the ability of most, perhaps ALL individuals to comprehend in the sense of the present meaning of comprehend. Is the knowledge of the mathematics involved in explaining how atoms or galaxies actually work the same as comprehending how they work?
@Slick: No, but between four to eight million years ago was the last common ancestor between humans and the rest of the great apes. If you want to talk about anatomically modern humans, that’s 200000 years, which would be just under 4 seconds on this clock.
I love the diagram – it puts a perspective on a timescale so hard to conceive of for individuals who, by this reckoning, live, love and die in a matter of milliseconds.
I do think it conveys a slightly false impression to have the present be represented by midnight, though. Wouldn’t it be more realistic (or optimistic), to extend the scale to the eventual death of the planet. If we take this to be around the time the Sun has finished burning its fuel, we’ve still got a good 5bn years ahead of us.
Without a shred of evidence with which to back this up, I instinctively feel that humanity is still on the start of its journey, not nearing the end of the day.
Agreed! Look what algae started, with just four hours. Redraw the clock to 10bn years and set goals.
Hear hear!
Yeah, the chart as it is is OK, but we aren’t at almost midnight, folks. We are just beginning (unless you are naive enough to have tasted of the global warming Kool-Aid, the nuclear brew, or the population explosion soda). Have a little faith in human spirit and our ability to solve the problems we’ve created. The fat lady hasn’t even been born!
I like the subjective comment in an objective conversation…
Though, technologically speaking we have just started to accelerate our technological knowledge, we are on the brink of the armegeddon, which we will caused ourselves.
I would bet you that Humans won’t get anywhere near the 5bn years it will take our sun to empty its fuel… And if we do, we would probably own half the our galaxy atleast by then. Matters little as it’s an empty bet, though.
the earth is more like 13.73 Billion years old for the record…probably still not quite right, but closer then those 5B estimates…
http://www.universetoday.com/13371/1373-billion-years-the-most-accurate-measurement-of-the-age-of-the-universe-yet/
That’s the estimate for the age of the Universe, not the age of the Earth.
oops…i meant the universe not earth..
Telescopic evolution
Surely it’s a 12 hour clock
Good point, Gaz!
so little time here, so many problem’s
Dig the chart although similar things exist (Carl Sagan’s calendar for instance). Though the visual aid has strong implications, I can reply to the question, “do humans matter?” with an emphatic “Hell yes” for myriad reasons. For one thing, the concept of importance is largely a part of perspective. And since we are all humans I think I can safely say that we matter (at least to other humans).
While I do appreciate the conciseness and poignancy of this type of graphic I feel as though it’s a bit of a cheat. Consider all that we know of the past and how little that we know of the future.
Also, If one were to create a graphic based on the timescale of galactic evolution, one could just as easily ask, “Does the Earth matter?”.
Does it? I mean we don’t really do anything beneficial for the rest of the galaxy or universe. Some other planets out there might actually be making space a better place.
Unlikely.
TWO, MINUTES, TO MIIIIIIIIIDNIGHT!
Great idea for a post.Thank you!
The missing dimension in this graph is the “importance” of say, Trilobites vs. Humans. Arguably, humans have had a greater impact, and have the potential to have a greater impact. So while humans haven’t been around long, we have (say) mined resources from under the groud, affected our atmosphere, and bred at a high rate. So the graph doesn’t really answer well the question posed in the title.
I guess I am bothered by the concept of the 24 hours. When does it become the next day? That is the question: assuming some, if not all humans, are still around, what will humans be like then
This gives a false sense of time because you place humans towards what we’d see as ‘the end.’ You have no way of knowing how much longer earth will be around. 10 years? 80? 5000? 10 million? 50 million?
If there is an astronomical amount of time left, everything on this clock could be compressed into the first 1/2 second on this clock.
Its a silly graphic.
Actually it’s not really meant to give a sense of time. It is meant to show how little time we have spent on Earth as a species. It is in no way predictive, and I don’t see why that connection was made.
A really neat and informative diagram – but why is it in a silty 12 hour clock, even though it states 24 hour clock?
The clock visual metaphor is ridiculous. Was this put together by a Mayan?
As for the implication that things don’t matter if they occur at the last second, tell yourself that breaking doesn’t matter the next time you almost run a red light.
In this regards, humans have a capacity to develop their own Earth(s) on other planets, and do it at much faster rate than this one. And this is because of one distinct factor they have……Intelligence.
The curiosity of humans have resulted into many astonishing outputs (this diagram for instance), and this makes them the entity that matters the most in this entire timeline.
“The curiosity of humans have resulted” tense agreement.
And imagine that! All of that was prepared by God just for our arrival! Wow, does He love us!
Scientists overwhelmingly believe that human action is a major cause of global warming. They also believe that, unless slowed or reversed, this warming will have catastrophic results by the end of the millennium. If you don’t believe that science, why do you believe the science represented by the chart?
http://daily.sightline.org/2008/10/16/we-are-so-fat/
“Taken collectively, we humans and our animals are more than twice as heavy as all other vertebrates on the planet combined. In fact, humans alone are 8 times as heavy as all the wild vertebrates on land.”
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198328
“A mass extinction is a world-changing event. In order to qualify, 75 percent of species must be eliminated within a “short” period (between a few hundred thousand years to a few million years).
This has only happened five times in history, and according to researchers at the University of California, Berkley, it’s happening a sixth time. This time, they claim humans are to blame.”
Humans matter.
Love the chart although I don’t think the question makes much as sense as asked. Matters to whom is what I’d like to know. We certainly matter to each other and I’m not sure anything ‘matters’ on a cosmological scale.
Human perspective is limited to the available knowledge and is bound to change. Subject to this limitation we are most evolved ones from the time life has got originated in earth and hence we do matter as much as any living things matter and it matters that we think and reflect and still try to unfold mysteries of the universe.
Montessori schools use this clock (google Montessori Clock of Eras) in their classrooms to help 6-9 year olds conceptualize the time-line before humans and after. A clock is used because it is a familiar measurement of time that children can understand. It is not representing the future as black…that is represents the Haydean (sp) era before there was life – when the planet was still volatile.
and we are just here a little more than one second, kinda puts things into prospective.
obviously, sex matters. It has been happening since 9:00, Earth time.